- The starting point is the standard retirement problem: given a certain amount of financial assets, how much can you spend each year without running out in your lifetime?
- The simplest type of solution takes the following form:
- Start with x% of your assets, the ‘initial safe withdrawal rate’
- Translate it to a dollar amount
- Then, every year, grow that dollar amount with inflation
- But what is the initial withdrawal rate x? The grandfather (or grandmother?) of answers is the famous 4% rule
- Over the years, the financial advice industry has moved away from it, which is good – but where did they land?
- I reviewed the major providers (Vanguard, Fidelity, Charles Schwab etc.) to see what they say and if there is a consensus within the industry
- Only some providers answer the question directly (others want you to talk to them for a customized solution). Here is a summary
Safe Withdrawal Rate in % by Time Horizon as of June ’25
| Horizon | C. Schwab | M.Star | Fidelity | J.P.Morgan |
| 10 | 10.3 | 9.7 | ||
| 15 | 7.1 | 6.7 | ||
| 20 | 5.4-5.6 | 5.2 | ||
| 25 | 4.4-4.7 | 4.3 | ||
| 30 | 3.8-4.1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | |
| 35 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.0-4.0 | |
| 40 | 3.1 | 3.2 | ||
| 45 | 3.0 | |||
| 50 | 2.9 |
Notes: C. Schwab = Charles Schwab as of April 2025. M.Star = Morningstar as of January 2025. Fidelity: using their Retirement Planning Tool in June 2025. J.P. Morgan: from their Guide to Retirement 2025
- A few takeaways:
- The major providers are more or less in agreement – that’s reassuring. MorningStar and Fidelity are very slightly more conservative than Charles Schwab
- Note that for very long horizons, the safe withdrawal rate is closer to 3% than 4%. Those who think about early retirement should take this into account
- Even at a 30-year horizon (a prudent number for many 65-year-olds), 4% is now considered too aggressive
Important: Your ‘safe spending rate’ is not the same is your safe withdrawal rate. Also, don’t take ‘safe’ too literally. See here for important notes and caveats.

Leave a comment